Operations

    Housing and Dining Accommodations: The DRC Responsibility Most Offices Understaff

    TODr. Thandiwe Osei-Mensah, Ed.D.February 20257 min readUpdated 2025-07-10
    Share:

    Key Takeaway

    Housing and dining accommodations now represent 25-30% of DRC workload at residential institutions, yet most offices have no dedicated housing coordinator. ESA requests alone have increased 300% since 2019. DRCs need clear policies, partnerships with residence life and dining services, and documented review processes to manage this growing demand without creating legal exposure.

    The Housing Accommodation Surge

    Housing and dining accommodations have quietly become one of the largest and most complex areas of DRC responsibility. At residential institutions, these requests now represent 25-30% of total DRC workload: yet most offices have no dedicated housing coordinator and no formal partnership with residence life.

    The numbers tell the story: ESA requests alone have increased 300% since 2019. Single-room accommodation requests have doubled. Dietary accommodation needs have grown steadily as institutions serve increasingly diverse student populations. And unlike academic accommodations, housing decisions involve legal frameworks beyond the ADA, specifically the Fair Housing Act, which has different standards and different enforcement mechanisms.

    ESA Requests: The Elephant in the Room

    Emotional support animals are the single most contentious accommodation issue on most campuses. The volume is staggering, the legal landscape is shifting, and the stakes are high, both for students who genuinely need ESAs and for institutions managing community living environments.

    A Workable ESA Policy Framework

    A defensible ESA policy should include:

    • Clear documentation requirements: A letter from a treating provider (not an online letter mill) describing the disability-related need for the specific animal
    • Species and breed considerations: You can set reasonable parameters, but blanket species bans are risky
    • Behavioral standards: The animal must be housebroken, non-disruptive, and under the handler's control
    • Roommate notification process: Roommates have a right to know about the animal, though not about the student's disability
    • Removal procedures: Clear, documented process for addressing animals that pose direct threats or cause substantial damage
    • Appeal process: Students denied an ESA must have a way to appeal

    The key legal principle: ESAs in campus housing are covered under the Fair Housing Act, not just the ADA. This means the standard for approval is generally lower than for service animals in academic settings. Institutions that treat ESA requests like academic accommodation requests often set the bar too high.

    Beyond ESAs: Other Housing Accommodations

    ESAs get the attention, but other housing accommodations are equally important and often simpler to implement:

    • Single rooms: For students with PTSD, severe anxiety, autism spectrum conditions, or medical conditions requiring privacy
    • Ground-floor rooms: For mobility impairments, chronic fatigue, or conditions exacerbated by stairs
    • Sensory-friendly housing: Quiet floors, reduced lighting in common areas, proximity to low-traffic zones
    • Air conditioning: For students with respiratory conditions or medication sensitivities
    • Proximity accommodations: Housing near specific campus resources (health center, dining halls, accessible routes)

    Dining Accommodations

    Dining accommodations are the forgotten sibling of housing accommodations. They affect students with:

    • Food allergies and intolerances: Celiac disease, severe nut allergies, lactose intolerance
    • Eating disorders: Students who need specific meal plan modifications or alternative dining arrangements
    • Medication-related dietary needs: Some medications require dietary restrictions or specific meal timing
    • Religious dietary needs intersecting with disability: Complex cases where both accommodations must be coordinated

    Most dining services are willing to accommodate, the problem is that nobody coordinates. The DRC approves the accommodation, but dining services doesn't know about it until the student shows up frustrated.

    Building the DRC-Residence Life Partnership

    The most effective model separates eligibility determination (DRC) from implementation (Residence Life and Dining Services):

    1. DRC determines eligibility: Reviews documentation, approves the accommodation category
    2. Residence Life implements: Handles room assignments, roommate coordination, move-in logistics
    3. Joint case management: Regular meetings to discuss complex cases, review appeals, update policies
    4. Shared documentation: Both offices access the same accommodation records (with appropriate FERPA protections)

    Key Policies to Have in Writing

    Every DRC handling housing accommodations needs documented policies on:

    • ESA approval criteria and process
    • Housing accommodation request timelines (ideally 30+ days before move-in)
    • Emergency/late housing accommodation procedures
    • Roommate conflict resolution when accommodations are involved
    • Dining accommodation coordination process
    • Appeal procedures for denied housing accommodations
    • Annual review and renewal requirements

    Without written policies, every decision is ad hoc, and ad hoc decisions create inconsistency, which creates legal exposure.

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Can a college deny an emotional support animal request?

    A college can deny an ESA request if the student doesn't provide adequate documentation of a disability-related need, if the specific animal poses a direct threat, or if the animal would cause substantial physical damage. However, blanket bans on ESAs in campus housing violate fair housing law.

    Who handles housing accommodations, the DRC or Residence Life?

    Best practice is a partnership: the DRC determines eligibility and approves accommodations, while Residence Life handles implementation (room assignments, roommate considerations). Problems arise when these offices don't communicate or when Residence Life makes eligibility decisions they're not qualified to make.

    TO
    Dr. Thandiwe Osei-Mensah, Ed.D.

    Director of Disability Services & FERPA Compliance Officer

    Thandiwe ran the DRC at a Big Ten school for eight years before joining AccommodoHub. She's reviewed over 12,000 accommodation cases and built the compliance framework that most of our product is based on. She still guest-lectures on ADA/Section 504 at Michigan's School of Education.

    Ed.D. in Higher Education Leadership, University of Michigan. Certified Disability Management Specialist (CDMS). 14 years directing DRC operations at two R1 universities serving 35,000+ students.

    FERPA Compliance
    ADA/Section 504
    DRC Operations
    View author profile →

    Share this article

    Share:

    Ready to modernize your DRC?

    See how AccommodoHub can streamline your accommodation management with a free 30-day pilot.